SEND & EHCP Tribunal Index
HomeSouth East › Brighton and Hove City Council

Brighton and Hove City Council

Data available

South East

79
appeals registered, 2024 (official DfE figure)
115
appeals registered, 2025 (official DfE figure)
Data available. At least one Freedom of Information response gives real, extractable figures on tribunal appeals or outcomes for this council.
Thinking about appealing, or partway through it? These are free, independent sources of advice — not run by this site, and not run by any council.
  • Amaze SENDIASS — this council's own free SEND information, advice and support service. Every council is legally required to fund one, at arm's length from itself · Advice line: 01273 772 289.
  • IPSEA — Free, independent legal advice on SEN law — including EHC plans and tribunal appeals.
  • SOS!SEN — Free helpline and 1:1 advice specifically on preparing a SEND tribunal appeal.
  • Coram Children's Legal Centre — Free education law advice line, including SEN appeals and EHC plan reviews.
  • GOV.UK: appeal an EHC plan decision — The official government guide to the appeals process itself — who can appeal, mediation, costs.

Structured outcome breakdown

Structured breakdown — 13/03/2014-31/08/2014 (partial year)
real, from FOI response
80%
20%
Resolved before hearing — 4 (80%) Contested, council lost — 1 (20%) Contested, council won — 0 (0%)
Council's own table labels 'upheld by SEND Tribunal' as 'Won' -- read as the appeal succeeding (against the council), consistent with this council's other response. resolved_before_hearing = 4 conceded + 0 withdrawn. Totals reconcile exactly (1+4+0+0=5).

By decision type

By decision type — 2019
Category (council's own wording)AppealsOverturned
Refusal to assess55
Refusal to issue1
Section B/F/I7
Section B&F4
Section F&I0
Placement3
By decision type — 13/03/2014-31/08/2014
Category (council's own wording)AppealsOverturned
Refusal to assess1
Refusal to issue0
Provision1
Description of SEN, Placement and Provision (B,F&I)3
By decision type — 2014-15
Category (council's own wording)AppealsOverturned
Refusal to assess0
Refusal to issue1
Description of SEN, Placement and Provision (B,F&I)7
Description of SEN & Provision (B,F)2
Provision & Placement1
By decision type — 2015-16
Category (council's own wording)AppealsOverturned
Refusal to assess0
Refusal to issue0
Placement1
Provision1
Description of SEN, Placement and Provision (B,F&I)6
Description of SEN & Provision (B,F)1
By decision type — 2016-17
Category (council's own wording)AppealsOverturned
Refusal to assess1
Refusal to issue0
Placement3
Description of SEN, Placement and Provision (B,F&I)9
Description of SEN & Provision (B,F)1
By decision type — 2017-18
Category (council's own wording)AppealsOverturned
Refusal to assess3
Refusal to issue0
Placement6
Provision5
Description of SEN, Placement and Provision (B,F&I)12
Description of SEN & Provision (B,F)5
By decision type — 2018-19
Category (council's own wording)AppealsOverturned
Description of SEN, Placement and Provision (B,F&I)2

Freedom of Information responses

Requested by Louise Phillips on 2020-02-06 · answered 2020-02-26 · covers 2019
2019 data (FOI ref 6026045): Complaints made about the SEND team: 10 formal complaints, plus 6 complaints received directly by the SEND team; of these, 0 concerned the EHCP needs-assessment process. Tribunals lodged against the local authority: 20. Of these: 5 were upheld by the tribunal, 4 were conceded by the LA, 3 were withdrawn, 1 was dismissed by the tribunal, and 7 were still ongoing at time of response. Breakdown of the 20 by ground: Refusal to assess 5, Refusal to issue 1, Section B/F/I 7, Section B&F 4, Section F&I 0, Placement 3. Refusals to assess that were overturned and assessments agreed following: mediation 6, tribunal 5, other methods 40. Of those, 41 went on to have a plan agreed, with 9 still awaiting a decision to issue at time of response.
Caveat: Figures are a snapshot as at the response date (26 Feb 2020, response ref dated 18/02/2020 on the data sheet): of the 20 tribunals lodged in 2019, 7 remained ongoing/unconcluded, and 9 of the 41 assessment-agreement outcomes were still awaiting a decision to issue a plan.
Partially successful
Requested by Miss Key on 2018-10-02 · answered 2018-10-29 · covers 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018
Since the Children and Families Act 2014 (13/03/2014). Complaints about the SEND team: not logged for 13/03/14-31/08/14, 2014-15 and 2015-16; 43 for the combined '2016-18' period, of which 6 concerned the EHCP needs-assessment process. Tribunals lodged against the local authority, by year (13/03/14-31/08/14, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19): 5, 11, 9, 13, 32, 3. Won (upheld by SEND Tribunal): 1, 0, 2, 0, 0, [not given for 2018-19]. Conceded: 4, 6, 2, 6, 11, [not given]. Withdrawn: 0, 3, 3, 5, 8, [not given]. Dismissed: 0, 2, 2, 2, 4, [not given]. Ongoing: -, -, -, -, 9 (2017-18), [not given for 2018-19]. Breakdown by ground - Refusal to assess: 1, 0, 0, 1, 3, [not given]; Refusal to issue: 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, [not given]; Placement: -, -, 1, 3, 6, [not given]; Provision: 1, -, 1, -, 5, [not given]. Additional combined-ground figures (council's note: appeals can have multiple grounds) - Description of SEN, Placement and Provision (B,F&I): 3, 7, 6, 9, 12, 2; Description of SEN & Provision (B,F): -, 2, 1, 1, 5, [not given]; Provision & Placement: -, 1, -, -, -, [not given]. Refusals to assess overturned and assessment agreed following - mediation: n/a, n/a, n/a, n/a, 2, 0; tribunal: 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0; other methods*: n/a (x5), 0. Of those, went on to have a plan agreed: 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0. *Footnote: council states it cannot provide the 'other methods' breakdown as it does not hold data at that level and compiling it would exceed the 18-hour FOI limit.
Caveat: No category/outcome breakdown given for 2018-19 (only some figures, since the request was made in October 2018, partway through that reporting year). Complaints figures not logged individually before a combined 2016-18 total. Council explicitly notes appeals can have multiple grounds simultaneously, so the two 'ground' breakdown tables are not mutually exclusive and should not be summed against the total lodged count.