SEND & EHCP Tribunal Index
HomeEast Midlands › Nottingham City Council

Nottingham City Council

Data available

East Midlands

52
appeals registered, 2024 (official DfE figure)
73
appeals registered, 2025 (official DfE figure)
Data available. At least one Freedom of Information response gives real, extractable figures on tribunal appeals or outcomes for this council.
Thinking about appealing, or partway through it? These are free, independent sources of advice — not run by this site, and not run by any council.

Estimated outcome breakdown

Estimated, not reported
72.6%
17.8%
Resolved before hearing — 53 (72.6%) Contested, council lost — 13 (17.8%) Contested, council won — 4 (5.5%) Partially split — 3 (4.1%)

This council's own answer doesn't give a usable outcome breakdown. This estimate applies the pooled England-wide outcome rate (no regional sample was large enough to trust on its own) to this council's own real, officially-published appeal volume for 2025 (73 appeals) — see how estimates work.

By decision type

By decision type — 2023-2025
Category (council's own wording)AppealsOverturned
Refusal-to-assess decisions challenged via appeal to First-tier Tribunal (SEND)17

Freedom of Information responses

Requested by Andrew Hall on 2026-04-07 · answered 2026-05-06 · covers 2023, 2024, 2025
Response to 'National FOI Request — SEND Performance Comparative Study' (ref IG-22767), questions 2 and 8 (other questions -- phase transfer, EP timeliness/provenance, complaints, LGSCO -- omitted as out of scope). Q2 Outcomes of challenges to refusal-to-assess decisions: (a) refusal-to-assess decisions challenged via statutory mediation: 2023-19, 2024-33, 2025-48. (b) challenged via appeal to First-tier Tribunal (SEND): 2023-1, 2024-6, 2025-10. (c) of (a)+(b), number where the Council changed position and agreed to assess (via mediation agreement, conceding appeal before hearing, or Tribunal order): 2023-13, 2024-19, 2025-33*1 (footnote *1: 'Moved away before hearing date reacted: 1'). (d) average time between refusal and decision to proceed: not held. Q8 SEND Tribunal appeals and concessions: (a) total appeals registered against Council decisions at First-tier Tribunal (SEND): 2023-41, 2024-50, 2025-67. (b) appeals conceded before final hearing, broken down: 2023 - Total 35 (LA:26, Parent:0, Agreement reached by both:0, Unknown:8, MA*1:1), Not reach hearing date:0. 2024 - Total 37 (LA:26, Parent:4, Agreement reached by both:3, Unknown:3, MA*2:1), Not reach hearing date:0. 2025 - Total 45 (LA:27, Parent:2, Agreement reached by both:1, Unknown:15), Not reach hearing date:20. Footnotes *1/*2: 'Moved away before hearing date reacted: 1' (one case each in 2023 and 2024).
Caveat: Council states: 'Please note although we record that the tribunal was resolved prior to the hearing date we often record the reason as ‘Consent Order’ or ‘Agreement Reached’ with no information as to how this was reached. As such there are a large number of outcomes for which I cannot provide a definitive answer as to whether they were conceded by the Local Authority or not.' The large 'Unknown' figures (8, 3, 15) and growing 'Not reach hearing date' figure for 2025 (20) reflect this genuine record-keeping limitation, not necessarily low concession rates.
Re-use terms stated by the council: "You are free to use any information supplied for your own personal use. If the information provided is marked as published under an Open Government Licence you are free to reuse it, subject to the licence terms. However, if the information is not published under an Open Government Licence and you wish to reuse it, for example, by publishing the information or issuing copies to the public, you are required to request permission for re-use of this information under the Re-use of Public Sector Information Regulations 2015 (RPSI). Your RPSI request must be in writing and include your name and address for correspondence, and specify the information you want to re-use and the purpose you intend to use it for."